Finite element approximation of singular power-law systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Finite Element Approximation of Steady Flows of Incompressible Fluids with Implicit Power-Law-Like Rheology
We develop the analysis of finite element approximations of implicit power-law-like models for viscous incompressible fluids. The Cauchy stress and the symmetric part of the velocity gradient in the class of models under consideration are related by a, possibly multi–valued, maximal monotone r-graph, with 1 r 8. Using a variety of weak compactness techniques, including Chacon’s biting lemma...
متن کاملMixed Finite Element Approximation of Darcy's Law in Porous Media
A mixed nite element formulation for eeciently computing the velocity eld for uid ows in porous media is presented. Raviart Thomas (RT 0) and Brezzi Douglas Marini (BDM 1) spaces of lowest order are considered and compared both on analytic and realistic test cases. The BDM 1 space proves to be preferable to the simpler RT 0 with respect to CPU time and memory storage, if a xed accuracy is requi...
متن کاملPositivity preserving finite element approximation
We consider finite element operators defined on “rough” functions in a bounded polyhedron Ω in RN . Insisting on preserving positivity in the approximations, we discover an intriguing and basic difference between approximating functions which vanish on the boundary of Ω and approximating general functions which do not. We give impossibility results for approximation of general functions to more...
متن کاملSingular Function Mortar Finite Element Methods
We consider the Poisson equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions on a polygonal domain with one reentrant corner. We introduce new nonconforming finite element discretizations based on mortar techniques and singular functions. The main idea introduced in this paper is the replacement of cut-off functions by mortar element techniques on the boundary of the domain. As advantages, the new discr...
متن کاملSingular Function Enhanced Mortar Finite Element 477
We assume the function f ∈ L(Ω). We also assume the function u0 has an extension H(Ω), which we denote also by u0. We let the domain Ω to be the L-shaped domain in 2 with vertices V1 = {0, 0}, V2 = {1, 0}, V3 = {1, 1}, V4 = {−1, 1}, V5 = {−1,−1}, and V6 = {0,−1}. It is well-known that the solution u∗ of (1.1) does not necessarily belong to H(Ω) due to the nonconvexity of the domain Ω at the cor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mathematics of Computation
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0025-5718,1088-6842
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-2013-02668-3